Helmis Labs · Forensic Analytics

When AI evidence
demands courtroom precision.

Litigation-grade AI forensics for disputes, regulatory investigations, and expert testimony. We produce analysis that survives cross-examination.

Interactive · The Influence Matrix

Name the tactic. Cite the code.

A sworn account — the who, what, when, where, why, and how — dialed against a validated matrix of manipulation, coercion, and persuasion tactics, each locked to the Georgia statute it implicates. Status-blind, one-shot, and read-only: it annotates, it never coaches, and every result passes to a human.

 influence-matrix · interactive dialer — 50 source-cited tactics · O.C.G.A. Title 16 (2024)

Georgia Code, 2026 · verify currency against the official source · not legal advice · 4Powered by 4Shadow Analytix

The Work Product

The Georgia warrant application form.

What the applicant carries to the Magistrate Court: a sworn affidavit describing the crime — who, what, when, where, and how — the accused's identifying details for service, the tactics the Matrix identified, and the top Title 16 offenses with their elements. Suggestions only; the judge decides probable cause.

Georgia Magistrate Court — Warrant Application (Affidavit) O.C.G.A. § 17-4-40 · probable-cause hearing · not a filing · not legal advice
Applicant (government photo ID required)
[Applicant name]
Filing fee
$0 — no fee for family-violence offenses
Accused — identifying details required for service
Full legal name
[Name]
Height
[Ht]
Race
[Race]
Eye color
[Eyes]
Address for service
[Address]
Jurisdiction
☑ Incident occurred in the county of filing
Standard of proof
Probable cause — "more likely than not"
Sworn statement — who / what / when / where / how
"For months he was perfect — constant compliments, gifts, said no one would ever love me like he did. Then he wanted me off social media, started showing up wherever I was and checking my phone. When I brought up how he'd screamed at me, he said it never happened and I was losing my mind. One night he grabbed my throat until I saw spots."
Tactics identified by the Influence Matrix
IsolationSurveillanceGaslightingStrangulationIntermittent reinforcement
System-suggested Title 16 offenses (top 3 · name · O.C.G.A. § · required elements)
§16-5-21
Aggravated Assault
Elements: assault with a deadly weapon or any object that results in strangulation. Basis: "grabbed my throat until I saw spots."
§16-5-90
Stalking
Elements: a knowing and willful course of conduct — following, surveillance, or contact — causing reasonable fear. Basis: "showing up wherever I was and checking my phone."
§16-5-23.1
Family Violence Battery
Elements: intentional physical harm or visible bodily harm to a household or family member. Basis: physical contact within an intimate relationship.
Judge's decision (probable cause): ☐ Grant warrant☐ Deny☐ Refer to mediation
Suggestions only — not legal advice and not a determination. The judge decides probable cause; if a warrant issues, the case proceeds to a prosecutor. Georgia Code Title 16 (2024), retrieved from Justia — verify currency against the official source. · 4Powered by 4Shadow Analytix
Core Services

Forensic-grade analysis
for high-stakes disputes.

From model bias investigations to IP theft and regulatory breach — we provide the structured, auditable analysis legal teams need to prevail.

⚖️
Expert Witness Testimony
Court-ready AI expert testimony for AI liability, algorithmic bias, data provenance, and model failure disputes. Analysis structured for deposition and cross-examination.
Civil litigation Expert reports Deposition prep
🔬
AI Model Forensics
Deep inspection of model behaviour, training data lineage, bias patterns, and inference reproducibility. Chain-of-custody documentation for all artefacts.
Model audit Bias analysis Data lineage
🛡️
Regulatory Investigation Support
FDA, EUDAMED, and EU AI Act investigation response. Structured evidence packages for SaMD disputes, GxP deviations, and validation failures.
FDA EUDAMED GxP EU AI Act
🧾
IP & Data Theft Analysis
Attribution analysis for AI-assisted IP theft, training data misuse, and proprietary algorithm reproduction. Structured for legal proceedings.
IP attribution Training data Similarity analysis
📊
Statistical & Quantitative Analysis
Defensible quantitative evidence packages. Statistical significance, causal inference, and damage quantification using validated methods that hold under expert scrutiny.
Causal inference Damage quantification Reproducibility
🗂️
Litigation Support & Discovery
Technical review of opposing expert reports, e-discovery of AI system artefacts, and structured rebuttal analysis for opposing counsel and arbitration panels.
Expert rebuttal e-Discovery Arbitration
Why it matters

AI disputes require a different standard of evidence.

Standard technical reports fail in legal proceedings. We build analysis chains that are reproducible, auditable, and built to withstand adversarial challenge.

01
Chain of custody from day one
Every artefact — data, model weights, inference logs — documented with provenance from first contact. Nothing introduced post-hoc.
02
Reproducible, not just credible
Analysis that opposing experts can run and arrive at the same result. Reproducibility is the floor, not the ceiling.
03
Written for judges and juries
Technical findings translated into clear, plain-language reports structured for non-technical decision-makers without sacrificing rigour.
Sector experience

"FDA technical submissions, legal forensics expert reports, and pharma and major-corp client deliverables require the authority signal that comes from disciplined, structured analysis."

Life Sciences & Pharma
Healthcare & MedTech — SaMD
Financial Services & FinTech
Government & Regulatory Bodies
Enterprise AI Deployments
Insurance & Actuarial Disputes
Our methodology

From engagement to expert report.

A four-phase forensic process designed for legal defensibility at every step.

Phase 01
Evidence Preservation
Immediate artefact preservation. Chain-of-custody established. Scope and legal privilege confirmed with counsel.
Phase 02
Forensic Analysis
Model inspection, data lineage reconstruction, bias quantification, and statistical analysis using validated frameworks.
Phase 03
Expert Report
Structured expert report with findings, methodology, reproducibility package, and plain-language summary for counsel.
Phase 04
Testimony & Rebuttal
Deposition preparation, courtroom testimony, and responsive rebuttal of opposing expert analysis.
Industries served

Where AI forensics is critical.

High-stakes sectors where AI decisions face regulatory, legal, or fiduciary challenge.

💊
Life Sciences
FDA submissions, GxP compliance, SaMD validation disputes
🏛️
Legal & Compliance
AI liability, algorithmic discrimination, contract disputes
💹
Financial Services
Algorithmic trading disputes, credit model bias, AML systems
🏥
Healthcare & MedTech
Clinical AI validation, diagnostic model disputes, EUDAMED

Know before you act.

Engaged early, forensic analysis prevents disputes. Engaged late, it wins them. Either way, you need analysis that stands.